Let me first say that my comments are in no way meant to disparage those women who do work; I understand completely at the pull to work outside the home and mother; I recognize the challenges and sympathize with these women. My thoughts are merely my own convictions based on much prayer, biblical study, and wise counsel of those whom I trust.
My beef with Palin as McCain’s VP choice has nothing to do with the fact that she’s a woman…exactly. And for the record, McCain wasn't my choice, either. I like that she's pro-life, pro-family, pro-gun, etc. She's a woman of convictions and convictions don't mean anything if you don't live by them.
I usually don’t get into debating politics and the who, the what, and the where; it's a waste of time. I’m more concerned with issues that either reflect my biblical beliefs or malign the Word of God. But, the choice of Palin as a V.P. choice has got me to thinking deeply and reflectively about these biblical views.
In order to get to my beef, you’re going to have to put up with a history lesson, a biblical history lesson, that is, especially since Jeff and I are teaching a Spiritual Development of Preschoolers class at church and this stuff is floating about in my head ready to burst.
The way God designed the family is as follows: Hebrew society was a theocracy - - God –centered and the family was patricentric in nature - - meaning “father centered.” The family was like a wheel, the father the hub. Each spoke represented something the father was responsible for: the welfare, physical needs, and spiritual well-being of his family (among other things) and he was delegated as head of the household.
The mother was responsible for providing food, clothing, and shelter for her children as well as providing wisdom and instruction to them (until the boys were 12 and moved under the immediate tutelage and vocational instruction of their father) and for providing wisdom to her husband. It was (AND STILL IS) the highest calling for a woman: motherhood. She was in no way subservient to her husband, but her role was functionally subordinate to her husband.
These roles didn't change in the New Testament too much, and what wasn't ordered as null and void in the New Testament (like food laws, etc.) should still be followed.Now, the more I read about developing emotionally, mentally, physically, and spiritually healthy children, the more I realize that it is the mother’s immediate charge and the father’s ultimate responsibility. (Side note: that’s why choosing a mate is the second most important decision you’ll ever make).
By the age of 4, the stage has been set for a child’s future success, AND, even more importantly to me, “they can think of God in a personal way and trust him with simple faith.” (Spiritual Growth of Children). My philosophy as a Christian parent is this: To develop God-honoring, God-serving, emotionally healthy, well-adjusted children who are beacons of light in a searching, lost, and lonely world. Everything I do as a parent should be aimed toward this goal.
Basically, God’s design for the family was perfect. A father to provide safety, shelter, nourishment, and spiritual instruction, as an umbrella around the whole family, and a mother to hold the handle of the umbrella around her children, guarding and guiding from the elements until it was time for them to move to their next authority.
We, in our selfish, greedy natures, have confused that fact. I’m being quite honest when I say that I truly believe a mother’s place is at home with her children, if she has been blessed with them. That’s why I’m at home with mine; that’s why Jeff works around 60 hours a week to provide for us in a job that is not his ultimate calling. That’s why we have one small car, new clothes only when our moms send them to us, and a strict budget that is only altered when pregnant Audrea really needs a snack. We have sacrificed physical desires and material wants to invest in the lives of our precious children.
1.) When a mother (of children still at home) works outside the home, her allegiance is divided. She is no longer just under the authority of her husband, but under the authority of her boss. I’m not saying that women can’t and shouldn’t work (you all know that I have worked and I still do consulting work from home from time to time); I’m merely showing that a mother who is so concentrated on her success at her job creates a divide in the home; she can’t give her full and complete self to her small children who need her. And it is essential for children to emotionally connect with their mother’s as babies if they are to grow up well-adjusted and emotionally healthy. When children are small, they especially need their mothers.
2.) If Palin had all teenagers or grown children out of the house, it wouldn’t bother me as much. But, in addition to her nearly grown children, she has a little girl who can’t be more than 8 AND a baby, an almost 5 month old. And this baby is an extra special baby with Down’s Syndrome. He needs his mother more than any of the rest of them. Babies need lots of love and personal attention from their mothers; they need more than what a day care or a daddy-every-day can offer. And a baby with special needs needs it even more. As V.P., Palin is taking on more than just a job. She is taking on a whole new life that will completely consume her. She will be tasked with secrets she can’t share with her husband (and as for me, I don’t have secrets from my husband), she will be gone more than at home, and she will be appearing by the side of the President more often than her own husband, and who takes over the responsibility for the baby? Her daughters? Where will her allegiance ultimately lie? She seems to be a woman of good sense, but my fear is for her children, especially the younger ones who will reap the negative impact of her absence.
3.) Her experience. She has very little. A little over a year in the governor’s office, two years as mayor, and some school PTA. If something should happen to John McCain, could she step in as Chief and lead our country? I honestly don’t think she’s ready.
